Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

SDLT, s 75A & Langham v Veltema disclosures

Marc Selby explains why, in light of s 75A, it may be important make a Langham v Veltema disclosure in relation to SDLT

The interpretation of tax legislation has become more uncertain because of the increasing trend for government to introduce wide sweeping anti-avoidance legislation intended to catch all avoidance schemes including those which might be devised following introduction of the anti-avoidance measure.

An early example of the trend is FA 2003 s 75A which was intended to counteract avoidance activity in SDLT for all time. It is effectively an SDLT mini-general anti-avoidance rule.

This article is not intended to include a detailed review of s 75A. However the features of that provision which have caused particular uncertainty in practice include:

  • the lack of any motive or purpose test thereby raising the possibility of the provision applying...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top