Without doubt the most interesting aspect of the Budget concerns the taxation of UK resident foreign domiciliaries. The government is proposing sweeping and multi-faceted reform:
The timetable for implementation of this proposed reform is a real shock. There must be serious concerns about the government’s ability to get this legislation in place, without technical defects, in the limited time available before the forthcoming general election.
Many will also worry whether a special tax regime lasting just four years will present a viable alternative to rival tax regimes in other countries, which are commonly available for ten or fifteen years. Arguably, four years is not a meaningful period – it is the fiscal equivalent of a one-night stand, whereas many wealthy internationally mobile individuals will be looking for a marriage.
For those foreign domiciliaries who are currently resident in the UK, there will (as ever) be winners and losers. The winners will include former RBUs with substantial offshore assets that, under the present regime, cannot be remitted to the UK except at a prohibitive tax cost, but who should be able to remit at a tax cost of just 12%. The losers will include those who have created ‘protected trusts’ in reliance on the current rules, who from April 2025 are likely to find themselves exposed to tax on all income and gains realised within such trusts. Such individuals are likely to feel very aggrieved; and rightly or wrongly, these developments will cement the UK’s international reputation for fiscal instability.
Without doubt the most interesting aspect of the Budget concerns the taxation of UK resident foreign domiciliaries. The government is proposing sweeping and multi-faceted reform:
The timetable for implementation of this proposed reform is a real shock. There must be serious concerns about the government’s ability to get this legislation in place, without technical defects, in the limited time available before the forthcoming general election.
Many will also worry whether a special tax regime lasting just four years will present a viable alternative to rival tax regimes in other countries, which are commonly available for ten or fifteen years. Arguably, four years is not a meaningful period – it is the fiscal equivalent of a one-night stand, whereas many wealthy internationally mobile individuals will be looking for a marriage.
For those foreign domiciliaries who are currently resident in the UK, there will (as ever) be winners and losers. The winners will include former RBUs with substantial offshore assets that, under the present regime, cannot be remitted to the UK except at a prohibitive tax cost, but who should be able to remit at a tax cost of just 12%. The losers will include those who have created ‘protected trusts’ in reliance on the current rules, who from April 2025 are likely to find themselves exposed to tax on all income and gains realised within such trusts. Such individuals are likely to feel very aggrieved; and rightly or wrongly, these developments will cement the UK’s international reputation for fiscal instability.