Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Supreme Court upholds barring order against HMRC

Heather Rowlands and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons) review BPP Holdings and its practical implications for the standard of conduct to be expected of HMRC and other public bodies when conducting litigation.
 

A striking factor of the litigation between BPP and HMRC which culminated in the Supreme Court judgment in BPP Holdings v HMRC [2017] UKSC 55 (reported in Tax Journal 4 August 2017) was HMRC’s argument rejected at all stages of proceedings that as a public body it should somehow be treated more leniently when it comes to procedural compliance. That HMRC maintained this argument before the Supreme Court notwithstanding the observations made by the Senior President of Tribunals in the Court of Appeal was particularly surprising. It is a central tenet of justice that parties to litigation should be aware of and understand their opponent’s cases.

As a public authority ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top