In Minera Las Bambas and another v Glencore Queensland and others [2019] EWCA Civ 972 the Court of Appeal addressed a number of points on the interpretation of a tax covenant given by Glencore. The covenant in question was slightly unusual and the case turned on the specific drafting. However the judgment also addresses several points of wider interest especially to those drafting tax covenants.
Glencore sold shares in Xstrata Peru SA (Xstrata) a Peruvian company to Minera Las Bambas and another company. At the time of the transaction Xstrata had significant input VAT credits some of which had already been repaid to Xstrata in cash...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Minera Las Bambas and another v Glencore Queensland and others [2019] EWCA Civ 972 the Court of Appeal addressed a number of points on the interpretation of a tax covenant given by Glencore. The covenant in question was slightly unusual and the case turned on the specific drafting. However the judgment also addresses several points of wider interest especially to those drafting tax covenants.
Glencore sold shares in Xstrata Peru SA (Xstrata) a Peruvian company to Minera Las Bambas and another company. At the time of the transaction Xstrata had significant input VAT credits some of which had already been repaid to Xstrata in cash...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: