The importance of having a valid VAT invoice and meeting national time limits for input VAT recovery are among the developments reviewed by Bryn Reynolds and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons).
In Tower Bridge GP Ltd v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 998 the Court of Appeal has confirmed that a taxable person was not entitled to input VAT where it did not hold an invoice that met the formal requirements of the Principal VAT Directive (PVD). In addition HMRC was not required to exercise its discretionary powers to allow a claim on the basis of alternative evidence where the taxpayer had failed to undertake even basic checks in relation to their supplier.
Tower Bridge GP was the representative member of a VAT group including CFE. CFE purchased carbon credits from Stratex that were connected to VAT fraud. The FTT found that...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The importance of having a valid VAT invoice and meeting national time limits for input VAT recovery are among the developments reviewed by Bryn Reynolds and Gary Barnett (Simmons & Simmons).
In Tower Bridge GP Ltd v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 998 the Court of Appeal has confirmed that a taxable person was not entitled to input VAT where it did not hold an invoice that met the formal requirements of the Principal VAT Directive (PVD). In addition HMRC was not required to exercise its discretionary powers to allow a claim on the basis of alternative evidence where the taxpayer had failed to undertake even basic checks in relation to their supplier.
Tower Bridge GP was the representative member of a VAT group including CFE. CFE purchased carbon credits from Stratex that were connected to VAT fraud. The FTT found that...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: