In Ince Gordon Dadds LLP v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 4 the FTT held that input VAT incurred by a holding company on a combined reverse takeover and fundraising transaction was not recoverable as input VAT. Although the FTT accepted that input VAT incurred by a holding company might properly be attributed to the downstream activities of the VAT group of its target on the basis of its intention to join that VAT group the input VAT in this particular case did not qualify. To the extent that the input VAT was incurred to raise extra finance the use of those funds to...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Ince Gordon Dadds LLP v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 4 the FTT held that input VAT incurred by a holding company on a combined reverse takeover and fundraising transaction was not recoverable as input VAT. Although the FTT accepted that input VAT incurred by a holding company might properly be attributed to the downstream activities of the VAT group of its target on the basis of its intention to join that VAT group the input VAT in this particular case did not qualify. To the extent that the input VAT was incurred to raise extra finance the use of those funds to...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: