VAT: amount of penalty
In United European Gastroenterology Federation v HMRC (TC02698 – 17 May) an association made significant underdeclarations of output tax in three successive returns. It notified HMRC of the errors after HMRC had arranged a visit to inspect its records. HMRC imposed penalties under FA 2007 Sch 24 calculated at the rate of 15% of the potential lost revenue. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the association’s appeal. Judge Poole observed that since the errors were not notified until after HMRC had arranged an inspection visit the disclosure was a ‘prompted’ disclosure within Sch 24 para 9(2)(a) so that 15% was the statutory minimum penalty.
Why it matters: The First-tier Tribunal upheld HMRC’s imposition of penalties at the rate of 15% of the potential lost revenue.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
VAT: amount of penalty
In United European Gastroenterology Federation v HMRC (TC02698 – 17 May) an association made significant underdeclarations of output tax in three successive returns. It notified HMRC of the errors after HMRC had arranged a visit to inspect its records. HMRC imposed penalties under FA 2007 Sch 24 calculated at the rate of 15% of the potential lost revenue. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the association’s appeal. Judge Poole observed that since the errors were not notified until after HMRC had arranged an inspection visit the disclosure was a ‘prompted’ disclosure within Sch 24 para 9(2)(a) so that 15% was the statutory minimum penalty.
Why it matters: The First-tier Tribunal upheld HMRC’s imposition of penalties at the rate of 15% of the potential lost revenue.
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: