In V Patel and others v HMRC [2019] UKFTT 620 (10 October 2019) the FTT found that shares had been overvalued for the purpose of obtaining relief under ICTA 1988 s 587B.
HMRC had applied to strike out the appeals and then served a notice of objection to the withdrawal of the appeals under TMA 1970 s 54(4)(b) on the grounds that as the expert evidence made plain ‘the amount of tax owing in the closure notices as issued was understated’. HMRC therefore wished the appeal to proceed to a hearing so that the tribunal could determine in accordance with s 50 the proper amount of tax to be assessed. Two of the appellants however opposed the re-instatement and the FTT found that HMRC’s application that their appeals be reinstated could not succeed. Their appeals remained struck out with the effect that their liability...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In V Patel and others v HMRC [2019] UKFTT 620 (10 October 2019) the FTT found that shares had been overvalued for the purpose of obtaining relief under ICTA 1988 s 587B.
HMRC had applied to strike out the appeals and then served a notice of objection to the withdrawal of the appeals under TMA 1970 s 54(4)(b) on the grounds that as the expert evidence made plain ‘the amount of tax owing in the closure notices as issued was understated’. HMRC therefore wished the appeal to proceed to a hearing so that the tribunal could determine in accordance with s 50 the proper amount of tax to be assessed. Two of the appellants however opposed the re-instatement and the FTT found that HMRC’s application that their appeals be reinstated could not succeed. Their appeals remained struck out with the effect that their liability...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
