Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Virgin Media Ltd v HMRC

Whether discount for prompt payment

In Virgin Media Ltd v HMRC [2020] UKUT 100 (TCC) (8 April 2020) the Upper Tribunal held that payment of a single advance sum for 12 months’ telephone line rental which was less than the total amounts paid on a monthly basis for an equivalent period did not amount to a ‘discount for prompt payment’.

In particular the UT decided that:

(a) the provision to a customer (a ‘saver customer’) of a fixed line telephone rental for a 12 month period for an advance payment of £120; and 

(b) the provision to a customer (a ‘monthly customer’) of a fixed line telephone rental for for a monthly payment of £13.50  

were not the subject of the same contractual arrangements with the result that the lower price of (a) compared to (b) over an equivalent period did not amount to a discount for prompt payment. 

Prior to legislative changes effective from 1 May 2014 VATA 1994 Sch 6 para 4...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top