Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Wholly and exclusively: does a tax motive prevent deductibility?

Can arrangements designed to reduce a business’s tax bill still be wholly and exclusively for the purposes of its trade? HMRC seems not to think so, writes Ross Birkbeck (Old Square Tax Chambers).

The wholly and exclusively test

ITTOIA 2005 s 34 and CTA 2010 s 54 are a key mechanism for controlling the amount of expenses a business can deduct when calculating its profits for tax purposes. They use identical wording in regard to income tax and corporation tax respectively: to be deductible an expense must be ‘incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade’.

The way to approach this key phrase has been addressed by the courts on many occasions. A good modern example is in Ingenious Games LLP v HMRC [2019] STC 1851 (at para 461 where the Upper Tribunal (UT) confirmed the approach of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT)) where the court summarised...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top