Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Capital allowances
Home
Capital allowances
CAPITAL-ALLOWANCES
Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd and others v HMRC
Court of Appeal decides capital allowances are available for environmental studies
Mersey Docks: you’re my wonderwall
Yousuf Chughtai
Davinder Sahota
Davinder Sahota and Yousuf Chughtai (EY) examine a recent FTT decision
which shows how complex and large structures can be considered to function
as plant for capital allowances purposes, even where other premises-like
functions may exist.
The Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Ltd v HMRC
Quay wall qualifies for capital allowances.
Tax and the City review for July 2024
Zoe Andrews
Mike Lane
The decisions in
JTI
,
Altrad
and
Burlington
are examined in this month’s review by Mike Lane and Zoe Andrews (Slaughter and May).
HMRC v Altrad Services Ltd and another
CA overturns UT decision in ‘magic’ capital allowances avoidance scheme.
CATS North Sea Ltd v HMRC
Transfer of trade and capital allowances provisions in context of ring fence trade.
Capital allowances: buildings, structures or plant?
Paul Farey
Paul Farey (AECOM) considers the FTT’s ruling on the
Acorn Venture
case
and yet another discussion around what constitutes expenditure on plant.
The move to permanent full expensing
Jasmine Kaur
The move to permanent full expensing marks a change in UK corporate tax strategy, writes Jasmine Kaur, Head of Capital Allowances at HM Treasury.
Capital allowances: a question of design?
Paul Farey
Paul Farey (AECOM) considers the impact of the Upper Tribunal’s ruling in
the
Gunfleet Sands
case.
Acorn Venture Ltd v HMRC
Capital allowances on camping pods.
Go to page
of
5
EDITOR'S PICK
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
1 /7
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
2 /7
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
3 /7
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
4 /7
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
5 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
6 /7
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
7 /7
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
NEWS
Read all
Urgent action could be required on non-dom ‘double remittances’
HMRC set out Pillar Two territories
Additional information requirements for creative industry claims updated
Private schools VAT challenge
HMRC increase late-payment interest rates
CASES
Read all
St Patrick’s International College Ltd and others v HMRC
Morgan Lloyd Trustees Ltd v HMRC
HMRC v Bolt Services UK Ltd
Other cases that caught our eye: 4 April 2025
HMRC v Innovative Bites Ltd and another
IN BRIEF
Read all
Excluded property trusts and 6 April 2025
IR35, staffing companies and the small company threshold
Country-by-country reporting goes public
When is 20% not 20%?
Are multiple trusts still a viable IHT planning strategy?
MOST READ
Read all
Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd and others v HMRC
Concerns remain over Making Tax Digital
HMRC closing in on tax avoidance (again)
V Louwman v HMRC
B Lynch v HMRC