Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
EIS
Home
EIS
EIS
Hoopla Animation Ltd (formerly known as Daisy Boo and Monkey Too Ltd) v HMRC
Arrangements relating to animation
project were disqualifying for EIS.
Putney Power Ltd and another v HMRC
Company did not commence trading before EIS deadline.
Misunderstanding purpose in Osmond and Allen
Thomas Chacko
The First-tier Tribunal’s ruling in Osmond and Allen reveals a mistaken approach to the transactions in securities rules, and to purpose tests in general, writes Thomas Chacko (Pump Court Tax Chambers).
Other cases that caught our eye: 24 May 2024
Discovery assessment on pension scheme charges upheld: L Trachtenberg v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 376 (TC) (9 May) involves another challenge to the scope of the discovery provisions, this time concerning pension scheme unauthorised payments charges...
Other cases that caught our eye: 17 May 2024
Post-cessation trade relief/notice of enquiry into return: There are two distinct aspects to A Dennison v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 364 (TC) (2 May 2024). The substantive issue is whether or not the taxpayer was entitled to claim relief under the...
How to handle venture capital tax reliefs
Mark Ward
Mark Ward (BDO) explains the qualifying conditions, benefits for investors
and practical points when claiming relief.
Lifecycle of a business: financing and growth
Neal Todd
Anthony Reeves
Neal Todd and Anthony Reeves (Fladgate) consider some of the funding methods open to a business trading as a limited company.
Tax relief for film investment
Robert Maas
I was reading an article on AccountingWeb the other day. It started:“In recent years, tax-saving schemes involving films have got their promoters into hot water and roasted unfortunate users in the newspapers. So why is the British Film...
Ames: a cautionary tale
Andrew Goldstone
Andrew Goldstone (Mishcon de Reya) believes that a recent case raises concerns over HMRC’s approach to litigation and illustrates the need for change in the EIS legislation.
Legal challenge to two UK reliefs: another EU uncertainty
Andrew Parkes
Brussels is threatening the UK with court action over ‘illegal’ tax breaks. Andrew Parkes (Milestone International Tax Partners) explains.
Go to page
of
2
EDITOR'S PICK
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
1 /7
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
2 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
3 /7
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
4 /7
Fixing the wrong problem? The need to tackle shadow advisers
Ray McCann
5 /7
Succession planning: the longer-term impact of the Budget on businesses
John Endacott
6 /7
2024: that was the year that was
Jemma Dick
7 /7
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
Fixing the wrong problem? The need to tackle shadow advisers
Ray McCann
Succession planning: the longer-term impact of the Budget on businesses
John Endacott
2024: that was the year that was
Jemma Dick
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 21 February 2025
HMRC launch e-invoicing consultation
NICs relief in special tax sites: postcode requirement introduced
Company size thresholds apply for off-payroll working rules
Paying voluntary NICs when abroad
CASES
Read all
A Taxpayer v HMRC
HMRC v Royal Bank of Canada
R (oao) Anglia Ruskin Students’ Union v HMRC
B Joseph v HMRC
Lloyds Asset Leasing Ltd v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
Salaried members update
Themes in UK corporate tax disputes for 2025 (and beyond)
JVs and the top-up taxes: does HMRC’s draft guidance bring clarity?
Reflections on the Budget fallout – three months on
BlueCrest: the CA ruling on Condition B
MOST READ
Read all
Salaried members: HMRC reverses position on the TAAR and Condition C
Lloyds Asset Leasing Ltd v HMRC
Salaried members update
US ‘rejects very nature’ of UN tax talks
Mersey Docks: you’re my wonderwall