Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

RETROSPECTIVE-LEGISLATION


Andrew Parkes (Andersen) considers the limits, if any, on the introduction of retrospective legislation.
The government intends to change the law retrospectively to make it clear that HMRC can use automated processes to issue notices to file returns and to issue penalties, report Catherine Robins and Steven Porter (Pinsent Masons).
The 2019 loan charge teaches us that there is more to statutory time limits than the technical analysis, write Richard Jeens and Rose Swaffield (Slaughter and May). 
 

Rowena Clifton and James Llewellyn (The VAT Consultancy) consider the Copthorn Holdings decision, which raises important questions about HMRC’s approach to its published guidance and how it should be held to account.

Lee Squires and Fiona Bantock (Hogan Lovells) review the VAT developments that matter, including: retrospective VAT grouping in Copthorn; abuse of rights in WebMindLicenses; vouchers used for business promotion in Associated Newspapers; and responses on the recent penalties consultation. 
 

Simon Yeo and Billal Malik consider the judgment in St Matthews (West) Ltd and others v HMRC on the legality of retroactive legislation.

EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top