Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

TAX-AVOIDANCE


Chris Davidson reviews the anti-avoidance measures in the current Finance Act and surveys the horizon for the next step in HMRC’s anti-avoidance journey.

The Upper Tribunal has now handed down the eagerly awaited judgment in HMRC v Murray Group Holdings and others, better known as ‘the Rangers case’. Robert Waterson and Adam Craggs review the lessons from the decision, which resulted in a loss for HMRC in its campaign against EBTs that it is likely to appeal.

The debate on tax is being distorted by poor reporting in national media and grandstanding from members of the PAC. It is time for advisers to take a more active role in better informing the public on tax, writes Pete Miller.

The cut in the top rate of income tax from 50% to 45% set up a tax avoidance opportunity. The numbers suggest plenty took advantage of it, David Smith reports

Few advisers will be surprised at the First-tier Tribunal’s rejection of the highly artificial ‘blue box’ tax planning scheme. David Whiscombe examines the decision which provides a useful summary of the current position on the Ramsay principle

Nigel Doran analyses the 147 page tribunal decision, which has attracted so much recent media coverage.

Tom Scott considers the topical issue of whether or not the UK can now be considered a tax haven, and the global tax legislative changes we can expect to see

BKL Tax reports on the case of Gardiner, involving tax avoidance and negligence

Jeff Webber answers a query on whether a loan could be caught as a ‘chargeable payment’ under CTA 2010 s 1088.

Commenting on the controversial measures to tackle mass marketed avoidance that are going through Parliament, Jason Collins writes that affected taxpayers need to consider their options, including any grounds for challenge.

EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top