Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
Advertise
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Upper Tribunal
Home
Upper Tribunal
UPPER-TRIBUNAL
Certainty vs deterrence: the Supreme Court’s approach to anti-avoidance legislation in Fisher
Ben Elliott
The Supreme Court has effectively left it open to future courts to counteract artificial avoidance, writes Ben Elliott (Pump Court Tax Chambers).
Gunfleet Sands Ltd v HMRC
Capital allowances disallowed for windfarm studies expenditure.
Conduct of proceedings in the Upper Tribunal: new guidance
Kelly Stricklin-Coutinho
New guidance has been issued on the conduct of proceedings in the Upper Tribunal. Kelly Stricklin-Coutinho (39 Essex Chambers) examines what’s changed.
Changes to applying for permission to appeal
Sophie Rhind
Sophie Rhind (Macfarlanes) reports on the game changing amendment to rule 24 of the Upper Tribunal rules.
Is payroll closely connected to welfare work for VAT purposes?
Victor Cramer
Victor Cramer (Stewarts) writes about the potential wider impact of the
Cheshire Centre for Independent Living
decision on payroll services in the care
sector, and questions whether the decision is correct.
Civil or criminal proceedings for serious fraud?
David Sleight
David Sleight (Kingsley Napley) examines a recent Upper Tribunal decision which is important for both tax and criminal litigators alike.
Sippchoice: the meaning of ‘contributions paid’
Matthew Harrison
Matthew Harrison (Withers) examines the Upper Tribunal decision concerning the registered pension scheme regime.
How to handle tax appeals
Constantine Christofi
Adam Craggs
A 20 questions guide, by Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi
(RPC).
News Corp: VAT treatment of digital newspapers
Karen Killington
The Upper Tribunal has found that digital newspapers could be zero rated. Karen Killington (KPMG) examines the tribunal’s reasoning and discusses its implications.
Contentious tax: quarterly review
Constantine Christofi
Adam Craggs
Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC) review recent developments over the course of the past three months.
Go to page
of
4
EDITOR'S PICK
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
1 /7
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
2 /7
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
3 /7
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
4 /7
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
5 /7
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
6 /7
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
7 /7
RBC: from the island of literal interpretation to the continental shelf
Victoria Hine
,
Kyle Rainsford
Cross-border group relief: Lloyds tripped up by the ‘main purpose’ hurdle
Gerald Montagu
Helping vulnerable individuals: a guide for tax professionals
Chris Holmes
,
Dawn Register
A ‘significant’ change in approach? Reflections on the Court of Appeal’s decision in BlueCrest
David Haworth
,
David Haughey
ScottishPower and the limits of von Glehn
Rupert Shiers
,
Suzanne Hill
Enhancing UK tax policy: how to stimulate business investment and economic growth
Donald Simpson
Buckle up your seatbelts: why 2025 will be a bumpy ride for US tax policy
Donald L Korb
,
Andrew Solomon
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 4 April 2025
Urgent action could be required on non-dom ‘double remittances’
HMRC set out Pillar Two territories
Additional information requirements for creative industry claims updated
Private schools VAT challenge
CASES
Read all
St Patrick’s International College Ltd and others v HMRC
Morgan Lloyd Trustees Ltd v HMRC
HMRC v Bolt Services UK Ltd
Other cases that caught our eye: 4 April 2025
HMRC v Innovative Bites Ltd and another
IN BRIEF
Read all
Excluded property trusts and 6 April 2025
IR35, staffing companies and the small company threshold
Country-by-country reporting goes public
When is 20% not 20%?
Are multiple trusts still a viable IHT planning strategy?
MOST READ
Read all
HMRC closing in on tax avoidance (again)
HMRC v Innovative Bites Ltd and another
Excluded property trusts and 6 April 2025
Country-by-country reporting goes public
Chancellor hints on digital services tax