Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

ANTI AVOIDANCE


The report published last month contains some fascinating detail which throws a light on how HMRC is approaching the task of settling large disputes, writes Chris Davidson CBE (KPMG).
 
Sandy Bhogal (Mayer Brown) examines a recent tribunal case on whether certain insolvency procedures amount to a change of control for group relief purposes and looks at the potentially significant ramifications. 
 
BEPS Action 14 sets out the principles for resolving international tax disputes in the future. The International Chamber of Commerce will be contributing to this debate at an OECD level. Ian Hyde (Pinsent Masons) and Robert Thomas (chair of the UK tax committee of the International Chamber of Commerce) share the findings of a recent ICC UK survey, which reveals strong support for introducing a mandatory binding arbitration and for greater taxpayer involvement in the arbitration process.
 
Lynne Rowland (Kingston Smith) explains the proposed changes to DOTAS hallmarks for inheritance tax.
 
Tom Wesel and Zoe Wyatt (Milestone International Tax Partners) review the revised EC’s Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive which will soon be adopted by the European Parliament to ensure a consistent and uniform implementation of BEPS recommendations across the EU.
 
Mark Middleditch (Allen & Overy) reviews recent developments affecting the City.
 
Alasdair Friend (Baker & McKenzie) reviews the recent cases of M Phillips and Tottenham Hotspur Ltd, which represent a reality check against too broad an interpretation of when termination payments flow ‘from’ an employment contract. 
 
Card image Linda Pfatteicher Bernhard Gilbey Tim Jarvis

Bernhard Gilbey, Linda Pfatteicher and Tim Jarvis (Squire Patton Boggs) examine the issues facing preferential tax regimes. 

Corporates are facing the regulatory scrutiny once reserved for banks. Gideon Sanitt (Macfarlanes) considers the treatment of the costs of such investigations.
 
The US Treasury recently issued new regulations to deter corporate ‘inversions’, where a US parented company and a non-US company combine and locate the tax residence of the merged company in a non-US jurisdiction. Joseph Goldman and Anthony Whall (Jones Day) review their impact.
 
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top