The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) released its 18th report of the 2014/15 parliamentary session on Tuesday, titled HMRC’s progress in improving tax compliance and preventing tax avoidance.
A recent survey of senior in-house tax professionals reveals dissatisfaction with HMRC’s conduct in dealing with and resolving tax disputes, writes Liesl Fichardt (Clifford Chance)
After the recent RTI fiasco, where thousands of employees may have had their tax bills miscalculated by HMRC, questions should be asked, says George Bull (Baker Tilly).
Taxpayers increasingly need to rely on statements made by HMRC which do not have the force of law, such as HMRC clearances given to a taxpayer or HMRC guidance. In this back-to-basics guide, Christopher Harrison and David Stainer (Allen & Overy) provide an overview of the principles which govern a taxpayer’s ability to rely on written statements by HMRC, particularly on legitimate expectation.
Andrew Goldstone and Sarah Albury (Mishcon de Reya) report on recent updates in the private client arena, including: the proposed new strict liability criminal offence; changes to the LDF; the common reporting standard in the UK; strengthening DOTAS and the VADR; and the Presumption of Death Act.
Former HMRC impact assessment programme manager Wendy Bradley raises concerns over the direct recovery of debts (DRD) consultation process.
Go directly to jail; do not pass ‘go’; do not collect £200. Is HMRC’s approach getting out of hand, asks Peter Vaines, partner, Squire Patton Boggs
The City of London Law Society has called for the direct recovery of debt (DRD) proposals to be dropped in response to HMRC’s much-discussed public consultation Direct recovery of debts, which closed on Tuesday.