Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

LITIGATION


Paul Farey (AECOM) examines two recent decisions that raise some unique considerations and add to the discussion as to what can qualify for plant and machinery allowances.
Will Scott and Susie Brain (Norton Rose Fulbright) examine an Upper Tribunal decision on the availability of capital allowances in the context of increasingly complex, technical assets used in the power generation industry.
A growing number of taxpayers can expect to be involved in ‘early stage’ tax disputes over the coming years. Sophie Lloyd and Rob Smith (Travers Smith) provide a practical guide for their advisers.
Lynnette Bober (Gateley Legal) takes a closer look at a case involving several diverse issues, not least the difficulties in overturning findings of fact by the FTT.
A Tolley report examines a recent decision of the immigration chamber of the Upper Tribunal, which has implications for tax hearings.
Beware the clever procedural skirmish, warn Jason Collins and Lauren Redhead (DLA Piper).
With thoughts on virtual hearings from Hui Ling McCarthy QC (11 New Square Chambers).
Recent trends in the contentious tax world, by Adam Craggs and Constantine Christofi (RPC).
As the dispute between PGMOL and HMRC goes back to round one, counsel for the taxpayer, Georgia Hicks (Devereux Chambers) and Jonathan Peacock QC (11 New Square), consider what the Court of Appeal judgment means for taxpayers in the employment status debate.
Oliver Marre (5 Stone Buildings) discusses the TOAA provisions in the light of the Fisher decision and asks: what should taxpayers do now to avoid penal income tax charges on offshore transfers?
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top