Market leading insight for tax experts
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
View online issue
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate Taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect Taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International Taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private Business Taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private Client Taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real Estate Taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp Taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
NEWS
CASES
IN BRIEF
ANALYSIS
ONE MINUTE WITH
PEOPLE & FIRMS
TRACKERS
AUTHORS
ISSUE ARCHIVE
BROWSE BY TOPIC
Corporate taxes
Compliance
Corporation tax
DPT
Groups
Transactional tax
Employment taxes
Employment taxes
Termination payments
Indirect taxes
Customs & Excise duties
Environmental taxes
IPT
VAT
International taxes
BEPS
CFCs
Cross border
Double tax relief
Foreign profits
Residence
Transfer pricing
UK competitiveness
Withholding taxes
Private business taxes
OMBs
Partnerships
Private client taxes
CGT
IHT
Pensions & investments
Trusts & estates
Real estate taxes
Property taxes
REITs
Stamp taxes
SDLT
SDRT
Tax policy & administration
Anti-avoidance
Appeals
Brexit
Compliance
HMRC Powers
Investigations
Litigation
Tax policy
Tax risk
Subscribe
Home
Saved articles
Viewed articles
View virtual issue
View online issue
Login
Logout
E-newsletter
About us
Help
News
Cases
In brief
Analysis
One Minute With
People & Firms
Trackers
Authors
Issue Archive
SEARCH
Home
Tax policy & administration
Home
Tax policy & administration
TAX POLICY ADMINISTRATION
Estoppel in a tax context
Abigail McGregor
Jake Landman
Jake Landman and Abigail McGregor (Pinsent Masons) explain how
estoppel has recently been used in tax cases by HMRC and also by taxpayers.
Case management before the tribunal
Dan Williams
Adam Craggs
Adam Craggs and Dan Williams (RPC) consider the various stages
involved in an appeal to the First-tier Tribunal and focus on the FTT’s case
management powers throughout the process.
Much ado about non-doms: the new policy paper
Lynnette Bober
Helen McGhee
Helen McGhee and Lynnette Bober (Joseph Hage Aaronson) examine what
we know now following this week’s policy paper.
Tax risk insurance claims explained
Julian Feiner
W&I and specific tax risk insurance has proliferated and tax claims are
emerging. Julian Feiner (DAC Beachcroft) explains the unique framework
for claims.
Revisiting the boilerplate withholding tax clause via 1962 (and beyond)
Ceinwen Rees
Serene Ho
Ceinwen Rees and Serene Ho (Kirkland & Ellis) explain why boilerplate
clauses exist and why it’s important to check that they are included in
the contract.
The new Labour government: challenges and opportunities
David Gauke
Bezhan Salehy
David Gauke and Bezhan Salehy (Macfarlanes) share their Treasury insights on
the practical challenges facing the new administration.
Contentious tax quarterly: Summer 2024
Harry Smith
Adam Craggs
The principle of open justice is the overarching theme in this review by Adam Craggs and Harry Smith (RPC).
HMRC’s guidance: what is it good for?
Jack Slater
Sarah Ling
HMRC’s guidance is often of limited value in a taxpayer dispute, and there is an increasing trend of HMRC ‘clarifying’ guidance, sometimes with purported retrospective effect. What then is it good for, ask Sarah Ling and Jack Slater (Macfarlanes).
Objects in the rear view mirror
Andrew Parkes
Andrew Parkes (Andersen) considers the limits, if any, on the introduction of retrospective legislation.
Rectification in the FTT: the fix for a lack of jurisdiction
Sophie Rhind
Gideon Sanitt
Gideon Sanitt and Sophie Rhind (Macfarlanes) review the decision in
Cooke
and its relevance for taxpayers of the FTT’s ability to consider rectification and rescission arguments.
Go to page
of
589
EDITOR'S PICK
Cards face up? HMRC’s approach to the duty of candour
Robert Waterson
,
Rebekka Sandwell
1 /7
Self’s assessment: Reforms to APR
Heather Self
2 /7
The new Overseas Workday Relief regime: worse than before?
Steve Wade
3 /7
A new chapter in the unallowable purpose tale: the FTT’s decision in Syngenta
Tanja Velling
4 /7
Non-doms post-Budget: where are we now?
Helen McGhee
,
Lynnette Bober
5 /7
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
6 /7
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
7 /7
Cards face up? HMRC’s approach to the duty of candour
Robert Waterson
,
Rebekka Sandwell
Self’s assessment: Reforms to APR
Heather Self
The new Overseas Workday Relief regime: worse than before?
Steve Wade
A new chapter in the unallowable purpose tale: the FTT’s decision in Syngenta
Tanja Velling
Non-doms post-Budget: where are we now?
Helen McGhee
,
Lynnette Bober
Tax Journal's 2024 Autumn Budget coverage
Derivatives, repos and stock loans: an overview
Matthew Mortimer
,
Tamar Ruiz
NEWS
Read all
HMRC manual changes: 13 December 2024
Scottish and Welsh Budget announcements
Lineker case settled
Anglesey Freeport: special tax sites designated
New overlap relief calculator
CASES
Read all
C Hoyle and others v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 13 December 2024
Five key cases of 2024
Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC
R Grint v HMRC
IN BRIEF
Read all
A tale of two businesses
Pension ‘megafund’ reforms: how does tax fit in?
VAT on livestream events
Time for a replacement wealth tax?
Refinitiv: not so clear cut
MOST READ
Read all
Stage One Creative Services Ltd v HMRC
Other cases that caught our eye: 13 December 2024
L v HMRC
A third route to exit: tax consequences of continuation fund transactions
Consultation tracker