On 12 May the EU General Court (GC) issued two further judgments in the series of ongoing appeals against European Commission decisions finding that tax rulings by national tax authorities give rise to unlawful state aid. Both cases involved tax rulings by the Luxembourg tax authorities. In one case Luxembourg and Amazon v Commission (Joined Cases T-816/217 and T-318/18) (Amazon) the GC annulled the Commission’s decision finding state aid; in the other Luxembourg and Engie v Commission (Joined Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18) (Engie) (currently only available in French) the GC upheld the Commission.
Despite the difference of result there is no inconsistency between the two judgments. The two...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
On 12 May the EU General Court (GC) issued two further judgments in the series of ongoing appeals against European Commission decisions finding that tax rulings by national tax authorities give rise to unlawful state aid. Both cases involved tax rulings by the Luxembourg tax authorities. In one case Luxembourg and Amazon v Commission (Joined Cases T-816/217 and T-318/18) (Amazon) the GC annulled the Commission’s decision finding state aid; in the other Luxembourg and Engie v Commission (Joined Cases T-516/18 and T-525/18) (Engie) (currently only available in French) the GC upheld the Commission.
Despite the difference of result there is no inconsistency between the two judgments. The two...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: