In the recent case of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd v HMRC [2018] UKUT 415 a US company provided the service of the use and functionality of the Aladdin investment management platform to a group company in the UK. The UK entity used this Aladdin service partly for managing VAT exempt funds (SIFs) and for the most part for managing taxable non SIFs. The VAT dispute essentially concerned whether and to what extent the UK company should account for VAT under the reverse charge mechanism on the fees paid for this service.
It was agreed between the parties that there was a single supply of the platform in this case and that the non-SIF usage constituted the predominant element....
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In the recent case of BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd v HMRC [2018] UKUT 415 a US company provided the service of the use and functionality of the Aladdin investment management platform to a group company in the UK. The UK entity used this Aladdin service partly for managing VAT exempt funds (SIFs) and for the most part for managing taxable non SIFs. The VAT dispute essentially concerned whether and to what extent the UK company should account for VAT under the reverse charge mechanism on the fees paid for this service.
It was agreed between the parties that there was a single supply of the platform in this case and that the non-SIF usage constituted the predominant element....
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: