Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Ames: a cautionary tale

The case of R Ames v HMRC [2018] UKUT 190reveals various issues concerning HMRC’s approach to decision making and litigation and the need for a change in EIS related legislation.

Case summary

In 2005 Mr Ames an experienced skydiver invested £50 000 for a 12% minority shareholding in a start-up indoor skydiving company. For two years Mr Ames worked tirelessly as a director of the company to set up the business working closely on the building’s design and construction gaining necessary consents and licences managing working capital finances and accounts and planning for the development of the business. After many years his investment paid off and by June 2011 Mr Ames had sold his shares for over £300 000 making a significant gain on his initial investment. Before he sold his shares Mr Ames called HMRC for advice and an officer...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top