The case of R (on the application of W Archer) v HMRC [2017] EWHC 296 (Admin) (reported in Tax Journal 10 March 2017) raises an important point of principle regarding the scope of the judicial review jurisdiction in the context of statutory tax appeals. There has been a raft of recent decisions regarding taxpayer challenges to HMRC decisions where the taxpayers by choosing the wrong forum in which to bring their challenges have had their cases dismissed. The decision as to whether to appeal a decision to the FTT or challenge it by way of judicial review proceedings may not be straightforward.
Archer also raises a number of points of principle regarding the effect of closure...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The case of R (on the application of W Archer) v HMRC [2017] EWHC 296 (Admin) (reported in Tax Journal 10 March 2017) raises an important point of principle regarding the scope of the judicial review jurisdiction in the context of statutory tax appeals. There has been a raft of recent decisions regarding taxpayer challenges to HMRC decisions where the taxpayers by choosing the wrong forum in which to bring their challenges have had their cases dismissed. The decision as to whether to appeal a decision to the FTT or challenge it by way of judicial review proceedings may not be straightforward.
Archer also raises a number of points of principle regarding the effect of closure...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: