In B D’Angelin v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 462 (TC) (30 May 2024) the FTT dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal against a closure notice withdrawing his remittance basis business investment relief in respect of an investment in a company controlled by the taxpayer. His use of a director’s loan account to fund personal expenses amounted to the extraction of value from the company.
The taxpayer was resident but not domiciled in the UK and was a remittance basis user. In 2016 he remitted £1.5m of his foreign income to the UK and invested in a UK company in which he was the sole shareholder and director. The company traded as advisers to global clients and family holdings. He claimed business investment relief under ITA 2007 s 809VA in respect of the investment with the effect that the £1.5m was treated as not having...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In B D’Angelin v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 462 (TC) (30 May 2024) the FTT dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal against a closure notice withdrawing his remittance basis business investment relief in respect of an investment in a company controlled by the taxpayer. His use of a director’s loan account to fund personal expenses amounted to the extraction of value from the company.
The taxpayer was resident but not domiciled in the UK and was a remittance basis user. In 2016 he remitted £1.5m of his foreign income to the UK and invested in a UK company in which he was the sole shareholder and director. The company traded as advisers to global clients and family holdings. He claimed business investment relief under ITA 2007 s 809VA in respect of the investment with the effect that the £1.5m was treated as not having...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: