Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Berlioz Investment Fund SA v Directeur de l’administration des contributions directes

Exchanges of information and the jurisdiction of the national courts

In Berlioz Investment Fund SA v Directeur de l’administration des contributions directes (Case C-682/15) (16 May 2017) the CJEU found that a tax authority which receives an information request from another tax authority is required to check whether the information sought has ‘foreseeable relevance’ and that the national courts have jurisdiction to oversee that process.

Berlioz was a joint stock company governed by Luxembourg law which had received the dividends from its subsidiary Cofima a French company free of withholding tax. The French authorities questioning whether the exemption actually applied had sent a request for information to the Luxembourg Tax Administration which had then sought the relevant information from Berlioz. Berlioz had refused to communicate some of the information requested and as a result a fine had been imposed.

Berlioz...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top