Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Bhaur: mistake cannot unwind artificial avoidance scheme

The Court of Appeal judgment in Bhaur provides a salutary lesson to those considering artificial tax avoidance schemes, writes Michael Avient (Temple Tax Chambers).

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Bhaur and others v Equity First Trustees (Nevis) Ltd and others [2023] EWCA Civ 534 provides a clear summary of the principles to be applied when seeking to invoke the equitable jurisdiction of mistake in respect of artificial tax avoidance schemes.

It considers the sometimes-difficult line to be drawn between a mistake or a misprediction and provides analysis of the decision of Lord Walker in Pitt v Holt [2013] 2 AC 108. Further it considers the principles to be applied to mistakes as to the consequences of transactions risk taking and tax.

What was the background?

The Bhaurs entered a tax avoidance scheme utilising an employee benefit trust and a perceived lacuna in IHTA 1984 s...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top