Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Bradbury v Ernst & Young

Personal Tax: Capital gains tax: professional negligence

Personal Tax: Capital gains tax: professional negligence

In Bradbury v Ernst & Young (CA – 12 March) an individual (B) sold a successful business in 1997 and received $150 000 000 in loan notes as consideration. On 2 April 1998 he subscribed the $150 000 000 for shares in a newly incorporated company (P). He claimed reinvestment relief (which was abolished for acquisitions made after 5 April 1998 by FA 1998 s 165 Sch 27).

However P was unable to reinvest the full amount of B's investment within the statutory time limit. Furthermore P reinvested much of the investment by buying controlling shareholdings in trading companies. Much of the value of these businesses lay in the goodwill they had built up before the acquisition by P. When the assets of the business were 'hived up' to P the base...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top