In a proactive submission, the CIOT is seeking clarification of HMRC’s position on whether non-cumulative shares with a fixed-rate dividend would still be regarded as ordinary share capital for the purposes of ITA 2007 s 989.
HMRC’s Company Taxation Manual at CTM00514 had previously stated that fixed-rate, non-cumulative shares would qualify as such, but the current position appears to be that any type of fixed-rate share would not, regardless of whether it is cumulative or not. The Institute also questions whether HMRC have revised this guidance because of the Upper Tribunal decision in Warshaw v HMRC [2021] STC 247. Interestingly, in the final of its clarificatory questions (para 2.5), the CIOT highlights a distinction between preference shares (covered in Warshaw) and ordinary shares, potentially leaving the door open to the possibility of fixed-rate, non-cumulative ordinary shares being considered as ordinary share capital.
In a proactive submission, the CIOT is seeking clarification of HMRC’s position on whether non-cumulative shares with a fixed-rate dividend would still be regarded as ordinary share capital for the purposes of ITA 2007 s 989.
HMRC’s Company Taxation Manual at CTM00514 had previously stated that fixed-rate, non-cumulative shares would qualify as such, but the current position appears to be that any type of fixed-rate share would not, regardless of whether it is cumulative or not. The Institute also questions whether HMRC have revised this guidance because of the Upper Tribunal decision in Warshaw v HMRC [2021] STC 247. Interestingly, in the final of its clarificatory questions (para 2.5), the CIOT highlights a distinction between preference shares (covered in Warshaw) and ordinary shares, potentially leaving the door open to the possibility of fixed-rate, non-cumulative ordinary shares being considered as ordinary share capital.