Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Connect Global Ltd v HMRC

Late evidence

In Connect Global Ltd v HMRC (Upper Tribunal – 19 October) HMRC rejected a claim for repayment of input tax on the grounds that the transactions appeared to be connected to MTIC fraud. The company appealed and HMRC made a late application to admit new evidence. The First-Tier Tribunal granted the application and the company appealed to the Upper Tribunal. The Upper Tribunal upheld the First-Tier Tribunal decision applying the principles laid down by Lightman J in Mobile Export 365 Ltd v HMRC [2007] STC 1794 and distinguishing C & E Commrs v GUS Merchandise Ltd [1992] STC 776 and HMRC v Brayfal Ltd Ch D 4 March 2008 unreported.

Why it matters: There have been conflicting decisions on whether Tribunals should admit late evidence from HMRC. The Tribunal here applied the principles laid down by Lightman J in Mobile Export 365 Ltd v HMRC...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top