Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Euro Park Services v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics

Cross-border mergers and procedural requirements

In Euro Park Services v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics (Case C-14/16) (8 March 2017) the CJEU found that a French provision was contrary to both the mergers directive (Directive 90/434 on the restructuring of companies of different member states) and TFEU art 49.

Cairnbulg a French company had been wound up for the benefit of its sole shareholder Euro Park (established in another member state). It had deferred capital gains realised on the transfer of assets to Euro Park. The French tax authorities considered that the deferral could not apply as Cairnbulg should have sought ministerial approval which would have been denied as the transfer had been made not for commercial reasons but for tax avoidance purposes.

The CJEU observed that member states are entitled to set out the procedural requirements under Directive 90/434 ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top