While last Wednesday’s Supreme Court judgment in the FII group litigation is good news for the FII claimants and for taxpayers in other disputes with HMRC, there is still some way to go in the UK and European courts before the final outcome is known.
In 1997 Parliament enacted provisions curtailing the statutory limitation period for VAT claims doing so without notice and retrospectively to the date of their announcement. The CJEU held this to be unlawful in its 2002 judgment in Marks & Spencer [2002] ECR I-6325.
A year or so later in 2004 Parliament enacted provisions curtailing the limitation period for restitutionary claims for overpaid taxes based on mistake again without notice and again retrospectively to the date of the announcement (FA 2004 s 320).
An uninitiated observer might be forgiven for thinking that...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
While last Wednesday’s Supreme Court judgment in the FII group litigation is good news for the FII claimants and for taxpayers in other disputes with HMRC, there is still some way to go in the UK and European courts before the final outcome is known.
In 1997 Parliament enacted provisions curtailing the statutory limitation period for VAT claims doing so without notice and retrospectively to the date of their announcement. The CJEU held this to be unlawful in its 2002 judgment in Marks & Spencer [2002] ECR I-6325.
A year or so later in 2004 Parliament enacted provisions curtailing the limitation period for restitutionary claims for overpaid taxes based on mistake again without notice and again retrospectively to the date of the announcement (FA 2004 s 320).
An uninitiated observer might be forgiven for thinking that...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: