In GM Fenech v Serious Organised Crime Agency (TC02944 – 18 October) the Serious Organised Crime Agency had begun an investigation into the tax affairs of an individual (F) who had been the controlling shareholder of a company (S) which bought and sold building materials although he was not a director. They seized more than £200 000 in cash and discovered that F had made significant deposits into certain bank accounts although he had declared on his tax returns that he had no taxable income for 2006/07 to 2008/09. They issued discovery assessments under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 s 317 and imposed penalties under TMA 1970 s 95. F appealed. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed F’s appeals finding on the evidence that he had been involved in fraudulent mortgage applications had been convicted for handling...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In GM Fenech v Serious Organised Crime Agency (TC02944 – 18 October) the Serious Organised Crime Agency had begun an investigation into the tax affairs of an individual (F) who had been the controlling shareholder of a company (S) which bought and sold building materials although he was not a director. They seized more than £200 000 in cash and discovered that F had made significant deposits into certain bank accounts although he had declared on his tax returns that he had no taxable income for 2006/07 to 2008/09. They issued discovery assessments under Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 s 317 and imposed penalties under TMA 1970 s 95. F appealed. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed F’s appeals finding on the evidence that he had been involved in fraudulent mortgage applications had been convicted for handling...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
