In a formal reply to the CIOT’s 3 July 2023 letter which raised various challenges around HMRC’s compliance approach to R&D claims, HMRC has committed to improving the quality of its handling of claims. HMRC understands, however, that half of all claims are non-compliant (75% of claims for amounts under £10,000) – statistics which ‘demand urgent action’. HMRC notes that ‘as 90% of R&D claimants are represented by an agent, we firmly believe this is a problem that requires collective action across the tax profession.’
HMRC’s volume compliance approach involves frequent challenge and the issuing of standard letters, with little opportunity for businesses or advisers to talk to HMRC or to explain the nature of their R&D claim. As the CIOT points out, historically advisers could discuss the R&D in question directly with HMRC but, under the new approach, there is often no direct engagement. The volume approach was implemented to address the high level of fraud and error HMRC has identified in R&D tax relief claims.
The CIOT urges HMRC to make sure that genuine claims are not adversely impacted by this compliance approach: ‘We remain of the view that the current volume compliance approach does not work well for R&D tax relief claims, due to the complex nature of the relief and the technical consideration required in ascertaining whether or not there has been a qualifying R&D project.’
In its wide-ranging response, HMRC sets out the following actions points which it either has already implemented or intends to bring forward:
HMRC also comments on raising standards in the tax advice market: ‘At their best, agents enable their clients to access the relief they are entitled to. However, as you and other stakeholders have told us previously, there are also agents who either lack capability or purposely abuse the schemes. Our compliance activity shows that some of those agents are part of national representative bodies.’
In a formal reply to the CIOT’s 3 July 2023 letter which raised various challenges around HMRC’s compliance approach to R&D claims, HMRC has committed to improving the quality of its handling of claims. HMRC understands, however, that half of all claims are non-compliant (75% of claims for amounts under £10,000) – statistics which ‘demand urgent action’. HMRC notes that ‘as 90% of R&D claimants are represented by an agent, we firmly believe this is a problem that requires collective action across the tax profession.’
HMRC’s volume compliance approach involves frequent challenge and the issuing of standard letters, with little opportunity for businesses or advisers to talk to HMRC or to explain the nature of their R&D claim. As the CIOT points out, historically advisers could discuss the R&D in question directly with HMRC but, under the new approach, there is often no direct engagement. The volume approach was implemented to address the high level of fraud and error HMRC has identified in R&D tax relief claims.
The CIOT urges HMRC to make sure that genuine claims are not adversely impacted by this compliance approach: ‘We remain of the view that the current volume compliance approach does not work well for R&D tax relief claims, due to the complex nature of the relief and the technical consideration required in ascertaining whether or not there has been a qualifying R&D project.’
In its wide-ranging response, HMRC sets out the following actions points which it either has already implemented or intends to bring forward:
HMRC also comments on raising standards in the tax advice market: ‘At their best, agents enable their clients to access the relief they are entitled to. However, as you and other stakeholders have told us previously, there are also agents who either lack capability or purposely abuse the schemes. Our compliance activity shows that some of those agents are part of national representative bodies.’