Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

HMRC v Hippodrome Casino Ltd

Dual economic use of premises made floorspace partial exemption calculation unsuitable.

In HMRC v Hippodrome Casino Ltd [2024] UKUT 27 (TCC) (29 January 2024) the Upper Tribunal (UT) allowed HMRC’s appeal holding that the taxpayer’s partial exemption override based on floor space did not guarantee a more precise calculation of recoverable VAT than the standard method. 

Under basic partial exemption principles VAT incurred on overheads that are not directly attributable to either taxable or exempt sales must be apportioned to determine how much is recoverable. The default approach to apportionment is the standard-method which is broadly a turnover-based apportionment. Sometimes the standard method will not produce a fair result that closely reflects how costs are actually used. Where the result of the standard method is radically different to a fair result based on ‘use’ the standard method override (SMO) can be triggered. 

The taxpayer (Hippodrome) operated an entertainment venue aimed...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top