In HMRC v Hyrax Resourcing Ltd [2022] UKFTT 218 (TC) (13 July 2022) the FTT granted HMRC’s application for a penalty to be imposed on the company for its failure to notify notifiable arrangements under the DOTAS rules.
In a previous decision ([2019] UKFTT 175 (TC)) the FTT had held that a loan contractor scheme (the ‘Hyrax arrangements’) constituted notifiable arrangements under the DOTAS rules and that the company was a promoter of those arrangements. HMRC therefore applied to the FTT to impose a penalty under TMA 1970 s 98C for the company’s failure to notify the arrangements.
There were three issues for the FTT to consider. The first issue was whether HMRC had shown that the conditions for a penalty had been satisfied and the FTT decided that HMRC had done so. The company argued that no penalty was...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In HMRC v Hyrax Resourcing Ltd [2022] UKFTT 218 (TC) (13 July 2022) the FTT granted HMRC’s application for a penalty to be imposed on the company for its failure to notify notifiable arrangements under the DOTAS rules.
In a previous decision ([2019] UKFTT 175 (TC)) the FTT had held that a loan contractor scheme (the ‘Hyrax arrangements’) constituted notifiable arrangements under the DOTAS rules and that the company was a promoter of those arrangements. HMRC therefore applied to the FTT to impose a penalty under TMA 1970 s 98C for the company’s failure to notify the arrangements.
There were three issues for the FTT to consider. The first issue was whether HMRC had shown that the conditions for a penalty had been satisfied and the FTT decided that HMRC had done so. The company argued that no penalty was...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
