Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Holistic construction

Two recent decisions have demonstrated conflicting approaches to the interpretation of multi-step transactions, write Angela Savin and Harry Smith (KPMG).

Recent weeks have seen the publication of two decisions of senior courts illustrating a differing approach to the tax treatment of multi-step transactions. In Trustees of the Morrison 2002 Maintenance Trust & others v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 93 (Morrison) the Court of Appeal dismissing the taxpayer’s appeal held that a series of transactions by which the taxpayers (trustees of a UK-resident trust) had hoped to dispose of shares free of liability to CGT by migrating the trusts outside the UK prior to a disposal before bringing the proceeds back onshore fell to be viewed as a single arrangement to be viewed – and taxed – in its entirety.

In contrast in Balhousie Holdings Ltd v HMRC [2019] CSIH 7 (Balhousie) the Inner House of the Court of...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top