In K Betts v HMRC (TC02824 – 22 August) a company director (B) submitted a tax return claiming not to be resident or ordinarily resident in the UK after March 2008. HMRC sought further information from B and subsequently issued a notice under FA 2008 Sch 36 para 1 seeking the production of bank building society and credit card statements. B appealed. The First-tier Tribunal allowed his appeal finding that the requirements of FA 2008 Sch 36 para 21 had not been satisfied. Judge Perez held that HMRC had not given a formal notice of enquiry under para 21(4) and that although B had drawn a substantial dividend during 2008/09 there was no reason to suspect that ‘an amount that ought to have been assessed to relevant tax for the chargeable period’ had not been assessed within para...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In K Betts v HMRC (TC02824 – 22 August) a company director (B) submitted a tax return claiming not to be resident or ordinarily resident in the UK after March 2008. HMRC sought further information from B and subsequently issued a notice under FA 2008 Sch 36 para 1 seeking the production of bank building society and credit card statements. B appealed. The First-tier Tribunal allowed his appeal finding that the requirements of FA 2008 Sch 36 para 21 had not been satisfied. Judge Perez held that HMRC had not given a formal notice of enquiry under para 21(4) and that although B had drawn a substantial dividend during 2008/09 there was no reason to suspect that ‘an amount that ought to have been assessed to relevant tax for the chargeable period’ had not been assessed within para...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
