Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

The Ladbroke case and unallowable purpose

Heather Self (Pinsent Masons) considers a recent case about a complex financial transaction where HMRC prevailed on an ‘unallowable purpose’ argument. 

Shortly before the introduction of the disclosure of tax avoidance scheme (DOTAS) rules in 2004 it was reported that the then Inland Revenue had met the big four accounting firms to complain about their role in selling a particular avoidance scheme (see ‘Big four warned about their role in ‘unacceptable’ tax avoidance’ Financial Times 17 March 2004). Despite this many of the recent cases that have reached the tribunal particularly in relation to schemes around financial instruments and loan relationships have emanated from the big four. The latest case Travel Document Service and Ladbroke Group International v HMRC [2015] UKFTT 582 (reported in Tax Journal...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top