Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Lessons from the Starbucks and FIAT state aid rulings

The judgments of the General Court in the Starbucks and Fiat cases give important guidance on some of the fundamental questions concerning the application of EU state aid rules to individual tax rulings, write Wiebe Dijkstra and Arjan Kleinhout (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek).

The long-awaited judgments by the General Court of the EU on whether unlawful state aid purportedly granted by the Netherlands and Luxembourg to Starbucks and FIAT – Starbucks and Starbucks Manufacturing EMEA v Commission (Case T-636/16) and Fiat Chrysler v Commission (Case T-759/15) – have received much public attention. And with good reason. While applying state aid rules to tax matters is nothing new it is the first time that an EU court decides on the substantive aspects of two of the pending individual tax ruling cases.

When examining the judgments in light of established state aid case law it is clear that...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top