The long-awaited judgments by the General Court of the EU on whether unlawful state aid purportedly granted by the Netherlands and Luxembourg to Starbucks and FIAT – Starbucks and Starbucks Manufacturing EMEA v Commission (Case T-636/16) and Fiat Chrysler v Commission (Case T-759/15) – have received much public attention. And with good reason. While applying state aid rules to tax matters is nothing new it is the first time that an EU court decides on the substantive aspects of two of the pending individual tax ruling cases.
When examining the judgments in light of established state aid case law it is clear that...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
The long-awaited judgments by the General Court of the EU on whether unlawful state aid purportedly granted by the Netherlands and Luxembourg to Starbucks and FIAT – Starbucks and Starbucks Manufacturing EMEA v Commission (Case T-636/16) and Fiat Chrysler v Commission (Case T-759/15) – have received much public attention. And with good reason. While applying state aid rules to tax matters is nothing new it is the first time that an EU court decides on the substantive aspects of two of the pending individual tax ruling cases.
When examining the judgments in light of established state aid case law it is clear that...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: