Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Lessons in disguise: tax mistakes and rescission

The recent cases of Bhaur and JTC illustrate the opportunities and challenges for taxpayers who have misunderstood the tax consequences of a transaction, write Ben Elliott and Arthur Wong (Pump Court Tax Chambers).

Fundamentals

Equitable rescission is an important remedy where a person has entered into a transaction acting under a mistake as to the tax consequences. Unlike the remedy of rectification which sees the court amend the terms of an instrument to reflect the parties’ intentions a successful rescission claim generally results in the disposition in question being set aside altogether. There is however some flexibility in this regard: see Kennedy v Kennedy [2014] EWHC 4129 (Ch) in which only one clause of the appointment was set aside on the basis that it was a self-contained and severable provision. Importantly rescission takes effect retrospectively thus the rescinded instrument will be treated both...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top