Q&A with David Southern on the high-profile case of cross-border group relief on subsidiary losses
In HMRC v Marks & Spencer plc [2013] UKSC 30 the Supreme Court ruled in favour of M&S in the long-running case concerning cross-border group relief on subsidiary losses.
What was the main issue in that case and how did the court reach its decision?
The case was concerned with the question of what constituted definitive losses for the purposes of allowing group relief on a cross-border basis within the EU.
Before the CJEU’s decision in Marks & Spencer plc v Halsey (C-446/03) [2006] All ER (EC) 255 the UK rules required both the claimant company and the surrendering company to be resident in the UK either as a UK company or as the permanent establishment of a non-UK...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Q&A with David Southern on the high-profile case of cross-border group relief on subsidiary losses
In HMRC v Marks & Spencer plc [2013] UKSC 30 the Supreme Court ruled in favour of M&S in the long-running case concerning cross-border group relief on subsidiary losses.
What was the main issue in that case and how did the court reach its decision?
The case was concerned with the question of what constituted definitive losses for the purposes of allowing group relief on a cross-border basis within the EU.
Before the CJEU’s decision in Marks & Spencer plc v Halsey (C-446/03) [2006] All ER (EC) 255 the UK rules required both the claimant company and the surrendering company to be resident in the UK either as a UK company or as the permanent establishment of a non-UK...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: