Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Mercedes-Benz v HMRC

Was a car financing arrangement, with no obligation to buy, a supply of goods?

In Mercedes-Benz v HMRC (FTC/13/2013 – 2 May 2014) the UT held that a motor vehicle finance agreement called ‘Agility’ was a supply of services (and not a supply of goods as contended by HMRC).

Agility was the product recommended to customers who wished to have the immediate use of a car in exchange for monthly payments but who were not sure they wished to purchase the car at the end of the arrangement. An Agility agreement therefore shared similarities with both a leasing agreement and a hire-purchase agreement.

Whether Agility contracts were supplies of services or supplies of goods determined the way VAT was chargeable on those contracts. If Agility contracts were not supplies of goods Mercedes-Benz would have to account for VAT on the consideration payable each month. If...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top