In Minister Finansów v Posnania Investment SA (Case C-36/16) (11 May 2017) the CJEU found that the transfer of land in lieu of the payment of tax was not a transaction subject to VAT.
Posnania was a Polish company which carried out a real estate business. In order to discharge arrears of tax it had applied to transfer land to the municipality. It had then applied for a ruling to determine whether the transfer was subject to VAT. The question of whether such a transfer could be held to be a ‘supply of goods for consideration’ within the meaning of the principal VAT directive had been referred to the CJEU.
The CJEU found that there was no relationship entailing reciprocal performance. A tax was a compulsory charge which did not result in any performance by the authority. Consequently ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In Minister Finansów v Posnania Investment SA (Case C-36/16) (11 May 2017) the CJEU found that the transfer of land in lieu of the payment of tax was not a transaction subject to VAT.
Posnania was a Polish company which carried out a real estate business. In order to discharge arrears of tax it had applied to transfer land to the municipality. It had then applied for a ruling to determine whether the transfer was subject to VAT. The question of whether such a transfer could be held to be a ‘supply of goods for consideration’ within the meaning of the principal VAT directive had been referred to the CJEU.
The CJEU found that there was no relationship entailing reciprocal performance. A tax was a compulsory charge which did not result in any performance by the authority. Consequently ...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
