In my article ‘Go City: end of the road for ‘protective assessments’?’ (Bryn Reynolds) Tax Journal 27 September 2024 I commented on the challenges HMRC faced in Go City [2024] UKFTT 745 (TC) where they considered that they had issued a protective assessment. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in that case considered that what HMRC had issued was not a protective assessment at all. In another new case Jeffries & Sons v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 1031 (TC) HMRC did issue a ‘true’ protective assessment to the ultimate detriment of the taxpayer.
The decision in Go City sets out that an assessment that is raised by HMRC purely to prevent an assessment from going out of time is not a protective...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
In my article ‘Go City: end of the road for ‘protective assessments’?’ (Bryn Reynolds) Tax Journal 27 September 2024 I commented on the challenges HMRC faced in Go City [2024] UKFTT 745 (TC) where they considered that they had issued a protective assessment. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in that case considered that what HMRC had issued was not a protective assessment at all. In another new case Jeffries & Sons v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 1031 (TC) HMRC did issue a ‘true’ protective assessment to the ultimate detriment of the taxpayer.
The decision in Go City sets out that an assessment that is raised by HMRC purely to prevent an assessment from going out of time is not a protective...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: