There may be a gaping hole (or two) in the NIC rules on share incentives that stems from anti-avoidance action and incomplete attempts at harmonisation of tax and NIC rules. David Heaton explores the arguments
There may be a gaping hole (or two) in the NIC rules on share incentives that stems from anti-avoidance action and incomplete attempts at harmonisation of tax and NIC rules. David Heaton explores the arguments
The question was raised as a result of a Large Business Service review of a newly acquired client's share scheme. One of the major moneyspinners for the LBS team currently working its way through UK PLC's 9 000-plus share schemes is the charge in ITEPA 2003 s 222 (the old ICTA s 144A for those still using Old Testament references) on...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
There may be a gaping hole (or two) in the NIC rules on share incentives that stems from anti-avoidance action and incomplete attempts at harmonisation of tax and NIC rules. David Heaton explores the arguments
There may be a gaping hole (or two) in the NIC rules on share incentives that stems from anti-avoidance action and incomplete attempts at harmonisation of tax and NIC rules. David Heaton explores the arguments
The question was raised as a result of a Large Business Service review of a newly acquired client's share scheme. One of the major moneyspinners for the LBS team currently working its way through UK PLC's 9 000-plus share schemes is the charge in ITEPA 2003 s 222 (the old ICTA s 144A for those still using Old Testament references) on...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
