Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

P Newey (t/a Ocean Finance) v HMRC

Abuse of law

In P Newey (t/a Ocean Finance) v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 366 (TC) (14 September) the FTT found that a VAT-saving arrangement involving Jersey companies did not amount to an abuse of law for VAT purposes and as a result HMRC was not entitled to assess VAT by recharacterising the transactions to counteract the alleged abuse. 

Mr Newey made VAT-exempt supplies of loan-broking services in the UK. He also incurred VAT on advertising services supplied to him. He was not able to recover this VAT so he set up a company in Jersey (which is outside the EU) called Alabaster. Alabaster continued to operate the loan-broking business under Mr Newey’s trading name (Ocean Finance) and received advertising services from a Jersey-based advertising company. No VAT was accounted for on the advertising services on the basis that it was supplied between two Jersey companies and so...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top