Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Pollen Estate and FA 2003 s 75A

In the first ever judicial consideration of FA 2003 s 75A (SDLT: anti-avoidance), the Upper Tribunal clearly indicated that it would apply a purposive, rather than a literal interpretation of the legislation.

In the recent Upper Tribunal decision in The Pollen Estate Trustee Company Limited and King’s College London various properties had been purchased by bare trustees to be held in undivided shares for beneficiaries who were absolutely entitled which included charities and crown bodies within FA 2003 s 107(2) as well as beneficiaries who were neither charities nor crown bodies. The appellants claimed partial relief from SDLT on the basis that each acquisition of an undivided share was a separate transaction which enabled a co-purchaser which was a charity or a crown body to benefit from charities relief or the exemption under s 107 respectively. The tribunal rejected this argument and decided in favour of HMRC that each purchase of...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top