Andrew Goldstone and Sarah Albury (Mishcon de Reya) review the latest developments that matter in the private client arena, including: HMRC’s hat trick of wins in cases against schemes promoted by NT Advisors; a consultation on VCTs; Lobler and rectification for the partial surrender of insurance policies; online filing of IHT accounts from August; and Tager and punitive tax-related penalties
HMRC has won three separate anti-avoidance cases in the UT against a scheme promoted by NT Advisors (see Healey v HMRC [2015] UKUT 0140 (TCC); Savva v HMRC [2015] UKUT 0141 (TCC); and Steve Price John Myers and James Lucas v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 297 (TC)). This is HMRC’s ninth win against schemes promoted by NT Advisors. The scheme sought to create an investment return that would be...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
Andrew Goldstone and Sarah Albury (Mishcon de Reya) review the latest developments that matter in the private client arena, including: HMRC’s hat trick of wins in cases against schemes promoted by NT Advisors; a consultation on VCTs; Lobler and rectification for the partial surrender of insurance policies; online filing of IHT accounts from August; and Tager and punitive tax-related penalties
HMRC has won three separate anti-avoidance cases in the UT against a scheme promoted by NT Advisors (see Healey v HMRC [2015] UKUT 0140 (TCC); Savva v HMRC [2015] UKUT 0141 (TCC); and Steve Price John Myers and James Lucas v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 297 (TC)). This is HMRC’s ninth win against schemes promoted by NT Advisors. The scheme sought to create an investment return that would be...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: