When HMRC seeks to triage the reasons why the government may not have successfully levied a certain amount of tax it uses the potentially loaded term ‘behaviour’. The tax gap statistics reveal that the second largest slice on the pie chart after the behaviour termed carelessness is lumped under the heading ‘legal interpretation’ in other words a divergence of opinion on the application of the law to the facts resulting in an outcome unfavourable to HMRC but which does not involve avoidance. HMRC estimate its losses here at £5.8bn or 16% of theoretical losses (or under 1% of theoretical liabilities). It is worth noting in passing that ‘evasion’ is pushed into...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:
When HMRC seeks to triage the reasons why the government may not have successfully levied a certain amount of tax it uses the potentially loaded term ‘behaviour’. The tax gap statistics reveal that the second largest slice on the pie chart after the behaviour termed carelessness is lumped under the heading ‘legal interpretation’ in other words a divergence of opinion on the application of the law to the facts resulting in an outcome unfavourable to HMRC but which does not involve avoidance. HMRC estimate its losses here at £5.8bn or 16% of theoretical losses (or under 1% of theoretical liabilities). It is worth noting in passing that ‘evasion’ is pushed into...
If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:
If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes: