Market leading insight for tax experts
View online issue

Purpose-based rules: have we hit BlackRock-bottom?

The targeted anti-avoidance provisions that contain motive tests are being applied in ways which prevent the tax system from operating effectively, writes Constantine Christofi (RPC).

There is a growing sense of concern amongst practitioners that HMRC’s wider strategy is to take a more expansive and at times blinkered approach to what are ordinary commercial transactions structured efficiently with tax in mind. The UK’s tax system is littered with ‘targeted’ anti-avoidance provisions in the form of purpose-based tests: there were more than 300 of them in November 2011 (per the GAAR report by Graham Aaronson QC at para 3.15) and more have since been enacted. The basic rationale for these tests was set out in HMRC’s Simplifying unallowable purposes tests discussion document of July 2009 which answered the question ‘why do policymakers need to consider purpose tests?’ as follows:

‘The Government’s policy...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxjournal.com, please click the login box below:

If you do not subscribe but are a registered user, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this article in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
EDITOR'S PICKstar
Top